Post by sam on Apr 9, 2009 20:37:23 GMT 1
Hello, I had a chance to fly all three of these airplanes today and have some reports. I ran them all thru their paces and I must say I was a little surprised.
1. Cessna Centurion
Good:
- Looks great
- Cool charger that doubles as a stand
Bad:
- Requires far more speed than the others to fly properly.
- Requires far more space
- Not very manouverable
- Requires constant attention even when trimmed properly
- Very noisy engine. (Maybe a bad batch?)
- Extremely delicate tail surfaces and wing. Broken after a few flights and hard landings. Tape repairs worked okay.
2. Ember
Good:
- Flies relatively slowly and doesn't require a lot of space
- Decent manouverability
Bad:
- Another very noisy engine. Hmm....?
- Have to pull landing gear off to store back in box
- Tail surface EXTREMELY fragile. Broken in half right away!
- Tail skid fell off first taxi
3. Vapour
Good:
- VERY slow flight. Perfect for indoors.
- Extremely manouverable
- Dead quiet
- Very durable. After I flew I let the some others fly it and the thing crashed hard probably 2 dozen times and no damage whatsoever.
Bad:
- Unless you don't like the look I haven't found any faults yet.
Summary: In my opinion the Ember and Centurion are a total waste of time and money. The tail surfaces are made of foam so brittle that even the slightest mishandling or crash causes damage. Very lame in my opinion. I assume all of these aircraft have the same engine but these two engines were very noisy. In my mind the most important thing for an indoor flyer is something that flies slowly. That means more versatility and places to fly. I was flying in a large aircraft hangar and the Centurion ate up the space quickly. You would need a very large area to fly this thing comfortably. The Ember was much better in this regard but couldn't touch the Vapor in terms of how slow it could fly. The Vapor can almost hover.
For my money the best of the three is the Vapor. HANDS DOWN!!!
Cheers
1. Cessna Centurion
Good:
- Looks great
- Cool charger that doubles as a stand
Bad:
- Requires far more speed than the others to fly properly.
- Requires far more space
- Not very manouverable
- Requires constant attention even when trimmed properly
- Very noisy engine. (Maybe a bad batch?)
- Extremely delicate tail surfaces and wing. Broken after a few flights and hard landings. Tape repairs worked okay.
2. Ember
Good:
- Flies relatively slowly and doesn't require a lot of space
- Decent manouverability
Bad:
- Another very noisy engine. Hmm....?
- Have to pull landing gear off to store back in box
- Tail surface EXTREMELY fragile. Broken in half right away!
- Tail skid fell off first taxi
3. Vapour
Good:
- VERY slow flight. Perfect for indoors.
- Extremely manouverable
- Dead quiet
- Very durable. After I flew I let the some others fly it and the thing crashed hard probably 2 dozen times and no damage whatsoever.
Bad:
- Unless you don't like the look I haven't found any faults yet.
Summary: In my opinion the Ember and Centurion are a total waste of time and money. The tail surfaces are made of foam so brittle that even the slightest mishandling or crash causes damage. Very lame in my opinion. I assume all of these aircraft have the same engine but these two engines were very noisy. In my mind the most important thing for an indoor flyer is something that flies slowly. That means more versatility and places to fly. I was flying in a large aircraft hangar and the Centurion ate up the space quickly. You would need a very large area to fly this thing comfortably. The Ember was much better in this regard but couldn't touch the Vapor in terms of how slow it could fly. The Vapor can almost hover.
For my money the best of the three is the Vapor. HANDS DOWN!!!
Cheers