Stock motor/prop/thread - Lets get it straight
May 15, 2012 0:54:47 GMT 1
nevthebluebear and fixit49 like this
Post by flydiver on May 15, 2012 0:54:47 GMT 1
There is a lot of ongoing confusion over the power train in the STOCK Cub. Let's try to straighten some of it out.
1. The ORIGINAL (red) Cub used a brushed motor, 7-cell NiMh battery (9.6v fully charged), and a 10x8 SLOW FLY (fat) prop. No one KNOWS for sure what the speed control (ESC) will handle but estimates hover around 13A. PZ will not divulge the specs.
With that system power draw:
HZ Supercub 10x8 Prop
Stock 7-cell NiMh
50% throttle = 4.37A and 39.9W
100% throttle = 10.07A and 83.4W
PZ 8-cell NiMh
50% throttle = 6.05A and 59.7W
100% throttle = 10.94A and 95.1W
Notice there isn't a lot of improvement at full throttle but is at half throttle.
Then the 'blue + 3S lipo' Cub came out. Prop was reduced to a 9x6 slow fly. There is a jumper you can pull that changes LVC to ~ 8.8-8.9v (which I consider inadequate and too low). Other than that there WERE NO CHANGES OR IMPROVEMENTS TO THE POWER TRAIN.
Power draw using a Master Airscrew 10x6 prop (pretty similar to the new stock 9x6 in terms of amp draw...I think)
3s Lipo (1500mAh, Zippy 20-30C)
50% throttle = 5A and 55W
100% throttle = 12.5A and 131W
Notice the bump to 12.5A on 3S lipo with a smaller prop. This is why the 3S lipo is preferred primarily. Lipo is also lighter and supports it's voltage under load better so the over all performance is noticeably improved.
But, the float prop suggest is the old NiMh-based 10x8.
Power draw for that is:
3s Lipo (1500mAh, Zippy 20-30C)
50% throttle = 6.82A and 83.2W
100% throttle = 18.37A and 212.7W
Note - the 1500mA Zippy lipo probably performs better than the stock PZ 1300mA lipo. IMO the stock lipo is poor performing and over priced.
Notice the Amp draw is around 18A with the 10x8. You can pretty much be sure the ESC will not take that on a continuous basis, nor will the stock battery for that matter. Most ESC are rated on a Continuous/Max usage rating. Usually the Max is for no more than 30 seconds. So, with the larger prop you can get away with bursts of full power for short periods, not continuous running. If you try it you will shorten your stock battery life if by some odd chance the ESC lives long enough to permit that. The motor also will not have a long life. These components were just not designed for that load. You can be pretty sure PZ fully knows that the stock components will be kept long enough to get through the learning phase and then the plane will be sold or seriously upgraded.
Short story - a power train is balancing act between the motor+prop+ESC+battery. You cannot just arbitrarily throw whatever you want together. You need to know the specs and performance of each component and balance them to the plane and performance you are looking for.
Motor/gearbox weighs 142gm.
1. The ORIGINAL (red) Cub used a brushed motor, 7-cell NiMh battery (9.6v fully charged), and a 10x8 SLOW FLY (fat) prop. No one KNOWS for sure what the speed control (ESC) will handle but estimates hover around 13A. PZ will not divulge the specs.
With that system power draw:
HZ Supercub 10x8 Prop
Stock 7-cell NiMh
50% throttle = 4.37A and 39.9W
100% throttle = 10.07A and 83.4W
PZ 8-cell NiMh
50% throttle = 6.05A and 59.7W
100% throttle = 10.94A and 95.1W
Notice there isn't a lot of improvement at full throttle but is at half throttle.
Then the 'blue + 3S lipo' Cub came out. Prop was reduced to a 9x6 slow fly. There is a jumper you can pull that changes LVC to ~ 8.8-8.9v (which I consider inadequate and too low). Other than that there WERE NO CHANGES OR IMPROVEMENTS TO THE POWER TRAIN.
Power draw using a Master Airscrew 10x6 prop (pretty similar to the new stock 9x6 in terms of amp draw...I think)
3s Lipo (1500mAh, Zippy 20-30C)
50% throttle = 5A and 55W
100% throttle = 12.5A and 131W
Notice the bump to 12.5A on 3S lipo with a smaller prop. This is why the 3S lipo is preferred primarily. Lipo is also lighter and supports it's voltage under load better so the over all performance is noticeably improved.
But, the float prop suggest is the old NiMh-based 10x8.
Power draw for that is:
3s Lipo (1500mAh, Zippy 20-30C)
50% throttle = 6.82A and 83.2W
100% throttle = 18.37A and 212.7W
Note - the 1500mA Zippy lipo probably performs better than the stock PZ 1300mA lipo. IMO the stock lipo is poor performing and over priced.
Notice the Amp draw is around 18A with the 10x8. You can pretty much be sure the ESC will not take that on a continuous basis, nor will the stock battery for that matter. Most ESC are rated on a Continuous/Max usage rating. Usually the Max is for no more than 30 seconds. So, with the larger prop you can get away with bursts of full power for short periods, not continuous running. If you try it you will shorten your stock battery life if by some odd chance the ESC lives long enough to permit that. The motor also will not have a long life. These components were just not designed for that load. You can be pretty sure PZ fully knows that the stock components will be kept long enough to get through the learning phase and then the plane will be sold or seriously upgraded.
Short story - a power train is balancing act between the motor+prop+ESC+battery. You cannot just arbitrarily throw whatever you want together. You need to know the specs and performance of each component and balance them to the plane and performance you are looking for.
Motor/gearbox weighs 142gm.